The LMS Lie: Why Your Learning Management System is Actually Making Learning Harder
We dive deep into why most Learning Management Systems are digital filing cabinets masquerading as educational tools, and what schools can do instead.
š§ Listen to the Episode
š” Tip: Right-click and "Save Link As..." to download for offline listening
šŗ Watch on YouTube
The Great LMS Deception
Welcome to the very first episode of Ed Tech Hates You! Weāre starting with a bang by tackling one of the biggest lies in education technology: that Learning Management Systems actually help students learn.
The Problem with Digital Filing Cabinets
Most LMS platforms like Canvas, Blackboard, and Google Classroom were designed as administrative tools first, educational tools second. Hereās what we discovered:
- Navigation Nightmare: Students spend more time finding assignments than completing them
- Feature Bloat: 80% of LMS features are used by less than 20% of teachers
- Mobile Misery: Despite promises of āmobile-firstā design, most LMS platforms are barely functional on phones
āI spent three hours trying to figure out where my professor posted the reading list. Turns out it was in the āModulesā section, under āWeek 3,ā in a folder called āSupplementary Materials.ā I gave up and emailed five classmates instead.ā - Anonymous student
What Teachers Actually Need
Through our interviews with dozens of educators, we identified what teachers really want from their tech stack:
- Quick Content Publishing - Upload a PDF, share a link, done
- Simple Communication - Announce changes, answer questions, provide feedback
- Basic Analytics - Who turned in what, when, and how are they doing overall
- Reliable Access - Works every time, loads fast, doesnāt crash during finals week
The Vendor Problem
Hereās the dirty secret: LMS companies make money from licensing deals with institutions, not from improving student outcomes. This creates a perverse incentive structure where:
- Features are designed to impress procurement committees, not end users
- User feedback is filtered through IT departments who rarely use the product
- Success metrics focus on āadoptionā (logins) rather than learning
Better Alternatives
Weāre not just here to complain. Here are some alternatives weāve seen work:
For Small Schools:
- Simple WordPress sites with protected content areas
- Notion workspaces with student access
- Google Sites + Google Drive combinations
For Larger Institutions:
- Open-source solutions like Moodle with heavy customization
- Hybrid approaches using Slack/Discord for communication + file sharing tools
- Custom-built solutions focused on specific institutional needs
The Real Solution
The best āLMSā weāve encountered was actually a teacher who used:
- A simple website for posting materials
- Email for announcements
- In-person conversations for feedback
- A paper gradebook (yes, really)
Her students had the highest engagement scores in the department. Sometimes the best technology is less technology.
Action Items for Educators
If youāre stuck with an LMS, hereās how to make it suck less:
- Simplify Navigation - Use only 2-3 main sections, ignore the rest
- Consistent Naming - Same structure every week/unit
- Student Onboarding - Spend class time teaching navigation, not assuming theyāll figure it out
- Backup Plans - Always have a way to share materials when (not if) the LMS goes down
Whatās Next
In upcoming episodes, weāll be diving into:
- Why āpersonalized learningā algorithms are anything but personal
- The accessibility nightmare hiding in plain sight
- How procurement processes are destroying educational innovation
Got horror stories to share? Questions about alternatives? Email us at edtechhatesyou@example.com
Special thanks to the 47 teachers who shared their LMS horror stories with us. Your pain was not in vain.
š Episode Transcript
Full transcript would go here for accessibility and SEO purposes.
š Show Notes
Links to research studies mentioned, additional resources for listeners.